|
|
By TheSupercargo
(dir. Pipilotti Rist – Austrian – German language)
y first film of the Gothenburg International Film Festival 2011 was this colourful, exuberant and anarchistic story, the first full-length feature film by Swiss video artist Pipilotti Rist. A good film to start the festival with, as it happened, though (appropriately) that was a consequence of serendipity rather than forethought.
The film tells the story of Pepperminta (Ewelina Guzik), who seems to be a combination of Alice from Wonderland and Dorothy from Oz, and who exists in time both as a young adult and as a child. (Her child self is played by Noemi Leonhardt). She lives partly in the real world, partly in a fantasy, but the two are not always separate. Pepperminta’s fantasy overlays reality like coloured plastic over the camera’s lens changes the colour of the world the lens sees.

Pepperminta is on a quest to live without fear, to help everyone she comes in contact with to know themselves and achieve exactly what they “really, really, really want”. Along the way she gains champions and partners: the fat, shy Werwen (Sven Pippig), Edna NeinNeinNein Tulip (Sabine Timoteo), and the elderly Leopoldine (Elisabeth Orth) who is close to death. Pepperminta helps each of them to overcome their fears and they join her and become her followers and accomplices.
The film makes great use of colour and perception, but also goes out of its way to focus on more senses than just sight: sound, touch, smell and taste also figure prominently. Special effects are generally of a more analogue than digital sort, for example, the stop motion sequences with strawberries or clothes, or the clever cutting in the “transporter” scenes when the characters travel to Pepperminta’s hideaway via her bath. Still, the production values are professional – this is video art for a cinema audience – and the film’s 80 minute running length does not seem too long.
It is not the most intellectually challenging of films, and I suspect some people will be irritated by the adult Pepperminta in the first few scenes. However, if you can reach the Nirvana of suspended disbelief quickly enough I think the film will charm and delight.
Unless you understand German, make sure you see a sub-titled version.
——————————————————————–
Links
Peperminta trailer on YouTube
Pepperminta official site http://www.pepperminta.ch/en
Pipilotti Rist on Wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pipilotti_Rist
Gothenburg International Film Festivalhttp://www.giff.se/us/public.html
By TheSupercargo
Yesterday evening I went to see my very first 3D movie: Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader. I know, hopeless. Why did I not see Avatar? Or Tron?
Well, that’s the way it goes.
The experience was not as disturbing as I’d feared. I only had to leave the salon once, fighting nausea but I managed to return to see the rest of the film after visit to the loo. (And it may have been the steak tartar got up as hamburger that I ate just before visiting the cinema that was to blame.)
On the other hand, the experience was not as exciting or as beautiful as I’d hoped. One scene of snowflakes falling around Lucy was nice – otherwise I didn’t feel the 3D experience added anything. Still, I should probably try out a made-for-3D film before dismissing a whole technology.
I didn’t enjoy having to hold the extra glasses on my nose  (see picture). I obviously have a short nose. And I particularly didn’t like the subtitles hovering above the surface of the film – though perhaps that’s something one would get used to.
By TheSupercargo
There are some great lines in Fantastic Voyage (some of them cited below), but I ended up going for a cheap joke at the expense of Raquel Welch and Donald Pleasence. I was inspired by the strip in the middle of the postcard above here, which is a still from the DVD. (What she’s actually doing is zipping her wetsuit closed preparatory to leaving the submarine to help unclog intake filters.) In my defence, the film-makers blatantly included Ms Welch in the cast only for her well-endowed chest – she has minimal acting duties.
I don’t know when I first saw Fantastic Voyage. I’d like it to have been at a matinée performance when it was released in Britain in the autumn of 1966, but I suppose that’s unlikely. (I would only have been 8 years old.) In all probability I saw it first on television sometime in the early 70s. The puzzling thing is, though, I think I remember the colours, but I don’t think we had a colour TV at the time.
Now the Oscar-winning special effects seem dated. The sea of arterial red corpuscles looks suspiciously like a back-projected close-up of a lava lamp. But lense flares (for example in the picture below) do hint at one of the effects JJ Abrams was trying to recreate in his recent ‘re-envisioning’ of Star Trek. (See here.)

A further source of memory confusion is that I almost certainly read Isaac Asimov’s novelisation of Fantastic Voyage (in which he corrected all the more gross scientific errors) before I saw the film.
Still, the scenes with the miniaturised submarine voyaging through a human body to deliver a surgical team to an otherwise inaccessible blood clot impressed me no end. It was one of the things that motivated me to achieve the high grade I did in my Biology O-level when I was 16. (Grade 2. I did better in Biology than in English Language. Which may not surprise any of my former students who have had the pleasure of studying English with me!)
Here are some of the great lines from the film I could have used but didn’t:
Arterial wall to the left!
They’ve crossed over into the jugular vein through an arterial veinous fistula!
That puts us right here which means we can head for the subarachnoid cavity.
The semilunar valve should be on our left any second now.
One other thought: In American films and TV series, 80% of the time, if one of the characters speaks in a British English accent, you know that’s the villain. Fantastic Voyage is no different. As soon as Donald Pleasence opens his mouth you know he’s the bad guy.

————————————————————————————-
The Internet Movie Database page for Fantastic Voyage (1966) here.
By TheSupercargo
The second DVD out of the box as I work through my birthday present to myself, is JJ Abram’s Star Trek from last year (2009).
Taking this film as my subject here also gives me an opportunity to brush off and republish my original review. (‘Review’ doesn’t seem quite the right word, but judge for yourself here.)
Star Trek is a film with a wonderful flora of quotes, but so many of the good ones are in-jokes for fans of the original series. I choose to illustrate instead one of the most puzzling features of the future. The lack of development in prosthodontics.
Poor Leonard Nimmoy, the original Spock, reappears (through one of those handy wormholes in the time-space continuum that Science Fiction films thrive upon), sucked away from 24th century, and masticates his lines through what appear at times to be rather ill-fitting dentures.
In my imagination I hear him advising his younger self.
Live, floss and prosper.
Oral hygiene, young Spock, oral hygiene. Even in 2387 dentists still can’t make false teeth that actually fit.
————————————————————————————-
The Internet Movie Database page for Star Trek (2009) here.
The official site for Star Trek (2009) here.
By TheSupercargo
As my own birthday present to myself, I bought a box of DVDs (mostly Science-Fiction related). I anticipate working my way through them bit by succulent bit (inclding, of course, all the Extra Material) and boning out some favourite quotes. Which I plan to share here in postcard form.
As chance would have it, the first film I watched was Tim Burton’s remake of The Planet of the Apes from 2001. It’s not a better film than the 1968 original, but it’s not nearly as poor as the reviews made out – those I read when it first came out and which put me off seeing it on the cinema screen.
Some of the actors behind the mask produced some really fine performances. Tim Roth and Paul Giamatti were outstanding, I thought, and Helena Bonham Carter was pretty damn good too, though her mask was less convincing.
Anyway, my nomination for the best line from the film has to be this one. Spoken by Paul Giamatti as the orangutan slaver, Limbo, who is selling humans as slaves:
The young ones make great pets. Just make sure you get rid of them before they mature. Believe me, the last thing you want is a human teenager running around your house.
————————————————————————————-
- The Internet Movie Database page for Tim Burton’s film here.
- The IMDb page for the original (1968) Planet of the Apes film here.
- Helena Bonham Carter’s makeup/mask at The Make-up Room
here. [Ah sad to say that link seems to be broken ]
- Interview with  Helena Bonham Carter about her role in The Planet of the Apes at Cinema.com here.
By TheSupercargo
Yesterday evening to see Star Trek. Very satisfactory!
(Italicised text below quoted from the Star Trek trivia section of the appropriate Internet Movie database page. Pictures from the IMDb’s collection of photos or taken from stills from the film’s trailers on the Star Trek Movie official site.)
To make the film appeal to the casual audience, Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman cut down on the technical terms, increased the action and named it simply “Star Trek” to indicate to newcomers they would not need to watch the other films.
On the other hand, for those who remember the original TV series, there are plenty of nostalgia nuggets to spot. Such as …
Majel Barrett, the wife of “Star Trek” creator Gene Roddenberry, has a role in this film as the voice of the Enterprise computer.
A role she played in the original TV series and several of the spin-offs.
She completed recording two weeks before her death on December 18 2008.
The film is dedicated to her and to Gene Rodenberry, Star Trek’s daddy.
Above: Zoë Saldana who plays ‘Lieutenant Uhuru’ (middle left) also played a character in The Terminal (2004), an immigration officer who is a Trekkie in her off-time (far left). New Zealander, Karl Urban, was shot to world stardom as ‘Eomer’ in The Lord of the Rings (far right) – looks a bit different as ‘Dr McCoy’ (middle right).
Zoe Saldana never saw “Star Trek” [the original TV series] … However, Saldana’s mother was a Star Trek fan and sent her voice mails during filming, giving advice on the part.
Yeah. I’m sure that helped!
Karl Urban is a longtime self-described “religious” fan of the Original Series. He used to watch it on Saturday mornings in New Zealand with his dad.
My dad wasn’t at home and my mum thinks SF is just silly. And I still turned into an SF fan – how’s that?
Above: When the credits rolled I couldn’t for the life of me work out which character Winona Ryder had played. Had to check on the IMDb. She is ‘Amanda Grayson’, Spock’s mother. That’s her, in character on the right. On the Extra Material, somebody regrets losing a scene where ‘Amanda’ gives birth to Spock, because “it’s the only scene where here ears aren’t covered and her humanity is revealed.” (As opposed to the vulcanity of Spock’s father). But as you can see from this picture, (still from the DVD) the curve of her human ears are plain – for a brief moment at least – under her headscarf.
Simon Pegg who plays ‘Montgomery “Scotty” Scott’ (in the strip above centre left) is better known in England as a comedian and comic actor. He played ‘Shaun’ (far left) in the zombie spoof Shaun of the Dead (2004).
Years before, Simon Pegg’s character in “Spaced” (1999) joked about every odd-numbered Star Trek film being “shit”. Now he says: “Fate put me in the movie to show me I was talking out of my ass.”
This film is number 11.
Scottish fans have complained that Pegg is English – they think the role should have gone to a Scot. This ignores two facts:
1) The original ‘Scotty’ was played by James Doohan, a Canadian of Irish extraction.
2) Neither Zachary Quinto nor Leonard Nimoy – who both play ‘Spock’ – are, in fact from Vulcan. (Not many people realise this.)
To develop the female characters, the wives of J.J. Abrams, Damon Lindelof, Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman were consulted. In fact it was Katie Abrams’s approval of the strong female characters that convinced her husband J.J. to sign on to direct.
This statement just leaves me speechless. What “strong female characters” – there is Uhuru and then there is … ? In this respect the film shows its socio-historical roots very obviously. But if you’re going to re-make a 1960s boy’s adventure with the original assembly of characters, what can you expect?
The girls – and I use the word deliberately – are there, but in the background (and in very short skirts). There are also two mothers. ‘Kirk’s’ and ‘Spock’s’. One gives birth to the hero: “He’s beautiful”. The other is protective and proud of her son. They’re positive images I suppose, but clichés. And they don’t occupy much screen time.
Oh yes, and the baddy is motivated by the death of his wife who we also see briefly.
Visually (above) it is very striking.
Production designer Scott Chambliss used the layout of the Enterprise bridge from “Star Trek” (1966), but gave it brighter colors to reflect the optimism of Star Trek; (J.J. Abrams quipped that the redesigned bridge “made the Apple Store look uncool”).
Taking advantage of the 35mm 2:35:1 anamorphic stock film, cinematographer Daniel Mindel caught as many lens flares (a photographic effect where light sparkles everywhere) in the film as possible, to create a sense of wonder that enhanced the film: “There’s something about these flares, especially in a movie that potentially could be incredibly sterile and overly controlled by CGI, that’s just incredibly unpredictable and gorgeous.”
It does look fantastic.

By TheSupercargo
 Leonardo diCaprio and Kate Winslet
Gothenburg International Film Festival 2009
Revolutionary Road is not Titanic despite Kate and Leo.
Suffocation of youthful dreams by 1950s US middle-class norms. None of the characters really sympathetic – mostly rather pathetic. All immature and kicking at the limits, but no one daring to cross them in any practical way except at the end when Kate’s character April tries to solve her problems. (OK there’s a Greek chorus – the lunatic son of the realtor – but he’s also trapped in the mental asylum and his parents’ protection.)
Leo’s character Frank less sympathetic than April; April is at least tragic in a small-town, Madam Bovary sort of way (though she sins far less).
What was the point of this film? I feel I’ve seen/read this story before. Many internal references to other films – deliberate I suppose. Based on a book from the early 60s, set in late 50s. But what does it have to say to us today? Could it be more relevant to a US audience? If this film had been made in US in early 60s I think it would have been scandalous and ground breaking (and would probably have existed in censored and uncensored versions). But today … it’s just a costume drama.
It’s a good costume drama. Director Sam Mendes makes good costume dramas (thinking of Road to Perdition), but he’s made films that seem relevant too (American Beauty). This isn’t one of those. It is very true to its period though, perhaps overly so? Very stagey.
For a Swedish audience Involuntary (De Ofrivilliga) has more of relevance to say.
Revolutionary Road worth an Oscar as ‘best film of 2008′? – Oh, come on!!
 Revolutionary Road screenshot
The above is a screen shot from the movie’s official homepage, the illustration of DiCaprio and Winslet is from the picture gallery on the same site.
——————————————————–
30th January
OK, having checked the Oscar site I see that Revolutionary Road has not been nominated as one of the best films of the year. A relief. I see it has been nominated in the catagories of Art Direction and Costume Design – so my “costume drama”" reaction wasn’t so far off the mark. Michael Shannon (who plays the “Greek chorus – the lunatic son of the realtor”) is nominated as best supporting actor, with which I have no beef.
My local newspaper, though, rates this film rather more highly. This morning’s edition includes a review awarding the film 5 points out of a possible 5, and the (middle class?) reviewer writes: “The question of what is an authentic life is … just as relevant to the middle class of today.” And “Possibly the film would have been even more interesting if the neighbours had been genuinely happy with their choice of life (a life in the suburbs can be authentic)”.
——————————————————–
3rd February
I just uploaded the illustration, so I’ll take the opportunity to add this note. I listened yesterday to Mark Kermode’s weekly film review podcast (at http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/podcasts/kermode/) and was relieved to find he felt much the same way about Revoutionary Road as I do. Relieved because in this church, Dr Kermode is one of the greater prophets.
By TheSupercargo
 Tilda Swinton, Isaac Julien and Derek Jarman's tombstone
Gothenburg Film Festival 2009
To see Derek – Tilda Swinton’s film about Derek Jarman.
Very good, documentary. Visually powerful and fascinating. Wonderful use of archive film (including what looks like private footage) and very well intercut with interviews Jarman gave and with Tilda Swinton’s own words. A sad film because it commemorates a rich, interesting, creative life cut short by HIV/AIDS. Sad also because Swinton clearly feels she’s lost a friend. Also an angry film (in places): Jarman’s anger and Swinton’s.
—————————————————
When you see Jarman’s work and his life in this film, you realise the abyss between your own medocrity and creative genius. And yet: Jarman thought of himself as a mediocre painter when he went up to the Slade and as a middle-aged has-been at the time of punk.
—————————————————
Tilda Swinton:
Art is culture
Culture is heritage
Heritage is tourism
Tourism is … the Art of Leisure
(Delivered in almost deadpan irony, but with an undercurrent of fury.)
—————————————————
Tilda Swinton is dismissive of film-makers who turn to making commercials – but Derek includes footage of Jarman’s music video of the Pet Shop Boys’ It’s a Sin, and Jarman saying this was his best work and that Neil Tennant (PSB singer/songwriter) “really saved me”. (By bringing him to a wider public notice? By giving him payed work?) What’s a music video if it’s not a commercial for the featured band/song?
—————————————————-
 Derek Jarman
The film was Tilda Swinton’s in the sense she is often in frame, her voice is used in the voice-overs, and she is reading her own words. But the director is Isaac Julian, conceptual artist and film maker. He also appears in a few frames, notably in the archive looking through Jarman’s boxes.
—————————————————-
Tilda Swinton’s poetry: The audience in a cinema, something like: we lean in from reality dipping into this virtual world, and then back again. No, I’ve lost the actual phrase, but it was a striking image. T.S. warns against taking film (any film – this film?) at face value.
Good film, I’d watch it again.
—————————————————-
The illustrations for this article are taken from the film’s homepage from where they are freely downloadable.
|
|