<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A little reading	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thesupercargo.com/a-little-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thesupercargo.com/a-little-reading/</link>
	<description>Words, Images, Speech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: TheSupercargo		</title>
		<link>https://thesupercargo.com/a-little-reading/#comment-6177</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheSupercargo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thesupercargo.com/?p=3647#comment-6177</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://thesupercargo.com/a-little-reading/#comment-6174&quot;&gt;Aleks&lt;/a&gt;.

On more sober reflection I don&#039;t think Rand&#039;s phlosophy and Skinner&#039;s psychology have &lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt; in common. Posthumous apologies to both! 

And neither are by any means unique in using SF to put across philosophical ideas. But some of the others did it with greater literary competence.

Take care ... especially with the practical side of chemistry 
:)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://thesupercargo.com/a-little-reading/#comment-6174">Aleks</a>.</p>
<p>On more sober reflection I don&#8217;t think Rand&#8217;s phlosophy and Skinner&#8217;s psychology have <em>anything</em> in common. Posthumous apologies to both! </p>
<p>And neither are by any means unique in using SF to put across philosophical ideas. But some of the others did it with greater literary competence.</p>
<p>Take care &#8230; especially with the practical side of chemistry<br />
🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aleks		</title>
		<link>https://thesupercargo.com/a-little-reading/#comment-6174</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aleks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 12:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thesupercargo.com/?p=3647#comment-6174</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What an interesting thesis to write! Utopianism and dystopianism are very interesting topics indeed. In december I read Ayn Rand&#039;s &quot;Anthem&quot;, a short dystopian novel. 

As for Rand, I have to agree with you on one point, her writing is rather in the category of &quot;not too good&quot;, but I don&#039;t think her main skill was in writing but rather in speaking, in getting a debate going and in discussing politics and social structure and human purpose. I haven&#039;t thought of it before, but now that you mention it, it does feel like she&#039;s kidnapped science fiction as a means to get her philosphy through to the reader. Most people I&#039;ve discussed Rand with feel her to be a mediocre writer but they still admire her philosophy. So far I&#039;ve gotter through &quot;Anthem&quot;, &quot;Atlas shrugged&quot; and &quot;The Fountainhead&quot; but I have several more books to go. 

One of my cousins has a doctorate degree in studying minority groups, especially Romani people. I had no point in telling you this, just thought I&#039;de mention it. 

Well, back to some chemistry now... Wishing you a nice rest of the week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an interesting thesis to write! Utopianism and dystopianism are very interesting topics indeed. In december I read Ayn Rand&#8217;s &#8220;Anthem&#8221;, a short dystopian novel. </p>
<p>As for Rand, I have to agree with you on one point, her writing is rather in the category of &#8220;not too good&#8221;, but I don&#8217;t think her main skill was in writing but rather in speaking, in getting a debate going and in discussing politics and social structure and human purpose. I haven&#8217;t thought of it before, but now that you mention it, it does feel like she&#8217;s kidnapped science fiction as a means to get her philosphy through to the reader. Most people I&#8217;ve discussed Rand with feel her to be a mediocre writer but they still admire her philosophy. So far I&#8217;ve gotter through &#8220;Anthem&#8221;, &#8220;Atlas shrugged&#8221; and &#8220;The Fountainhead&#8221; but I have several more books to go. </p>
<p>One of my cousins has a doctorate degree in studying minority groups, especially Romani people. I had no point in telling you this, just thought I&#8217;de mention it. </p>
<p>Well, back to some chemistry now&#8230; Wishing you a nice rest of the week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TheSupercargo		</title>
		<link>https://thesupercargo.com/a-little-reading/#comment-6173</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheSupercargo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 12:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thesupercargo.com/?p=3647#comment-6173</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://thesupercargo.com/a-little-reading/#comment-6162&quot;&gt;Aleks&lt;/a&gt;.

I was disappointed at how long it took me to read Mohtadi&#039;s book. Thought I was quicker in Swedish. (It&#039;s not long and isn&#039;t written in complex language, but it still took ages.) I&#039;d conclude it wasn&#039;t really very interesting - and after all I never read any of Taikon&#039;s Katitzi books so I have no emotional-nostalgic relation to her. But actually I think the historical and continuing private and institutional racism directed at the Romani people in Sweden and elsewhere &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; interesting. And I was intrigued by the sidelight the book casts on Swedish hypocrisy during WW2 and the quarter century after. So I must conclude I just don&#039;t read well in Swedish.

I&#039;m reading the PD James now - going much faster. :)

Alan Ryan&#039;s book doesn&#039;t sound particularly light... though compared with chemistry I&#039;ll believe it might come off as an indulgence read.

As for Ayn Rand, I&#039;ve only read &lt;em&gt;Atlas Shrugged&lt;/em&gt;. Years ago, and I&#039;m not sure I ever got to the end of it. I don&#039;t remember it as being very well written and for some reason it shares a place in my memory with BF Skinner&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Walden Two&lt;/em&gt;. Not because of a similar philosophy (though I think there are points of comparison), but for the way they both hijacked a literary genre close to my heart (Science Fiction) as a vehicle for promulgating their ideas. Also I read them both at about the same time. (I was writing my undergraduate thesis on utopianism and dystopianism).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://thesupercargo.com/a-little-reading/#comment-6162">Aleks</a>.</p>
<p>I was disappointed at how long it took me to read Mohtadi&#8217;s book. Thought I was quicker in Swedish. (It&#8217;s not long and isn&#8217;t written in complex language, but it still took ages.) I&#8217;d conclude it wasn&#8217;t really very interesting &#8211; and after all I never read any of Taikon&#8217;s Katitzi books so I have no emotional-nostalgic relation to her. But actually I think the historical and continuing private and institutional racism directed at the Romani people in Sweden and elsewhere <em>is</em> interesting. And I was intrigued by the sidelight the book casts on Swedish hypocrisy during WW2 and the quarter century after. So I must conclude I just don&#8217;t read well in Swedish.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m reading the PD James now &#8211; going much faster. 🙂</p>
<p>Alan Ryan&#8217;s book doesn&#8217;t sound particularly light&#8230; though compared with chemistry I&#8217;ll believe it might come off as an indulgence read.</p>
<p>As for Ayn Rand, I&#8217;ve only read <em>Atlas Shrugged</em>. Years ago, and I&#8217;m not sure I ever got to the end of it. I don&#8217;t remember it as being very well written and for some reason it shares a place in my memory with BF Skinner&#8217;s <em>Walden Two</em>. Not because of a similar philosophy (though I think there are points of comparison), but for the way they both hijacked a literary genre close to my heart (Science Fiction) as a vehicle for promulgating their ideas. Also I read them both at about the same time. (I was writing my undergraduate thesis on utopianism and dystopianism).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aleks		</title>
		<link>https://thesupercargo.com/a-little-reading/#comment-6162</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aleks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 07:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thesupercargo.com/?p=3647#comment-6162</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m currently trying to get through &quot;On Politics: A History of Political Thought - From Herodotus to the Present&quot; by Alan Ryan (I think the title is rather self-explanatory, the book is quite difficult despite the fact that I consider my english to be rather good, at the moment the author is examining Aristole, Plato and Socrates and their views on the State), alongside &quot;The romantic manifesto&quot; by Ayn Rand (a book about art, in all forms, and its meaning and role in human life, described from an Objectivist viewpoint) and a coursebook in chemistry and a coursebook in biology. Unfortunately, as my biology and chemistry courses have picked up some speed now, I find myself reading mostly the coursebooks but I try to get a few pages of &quot;luxury/freetime&quot; reading done every evening before I turn off the light and fall asleep. I&#039;ve been studyying chemistry all weekend long, with a fever, so today I intend to reward myself by not reading a single page in a coursebook and sit down with both Ryan and Rand and just enjoy!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m currently trying to get through &#8220;On Politics: A History of Political Thought &#8211; From Herodotus to the Present&#8221; by Alan Ryan (I think the title is rather self-explanatory, the book is quite difficult despite the fact that I consider my english to be rather good, at the moment the author is examining Aristole, Plato and Socrates and their views on the State), alongside &#8220;The romantic manifesto&#8221; by Ayn Rand (a book about art, in all forms, and its meaning and role in human life, described from an Objectivist viewpoint) and a coursebook in chemistry and a coursebook in biology. Unfortunately, as my biology and chemistry courses have picked up some speed now, I find myself reading mostly the coursebooks but I try to get a few pages of &#8220;luxury/freetime&#8221; reading done every evening before I turn off the light and fall asleep. I&#8217;ve been studyying chemistry all weekend long, with a fever, so today I intend to reward myself by not reading a single page in a coursebook and sit down with both Ryan and Rand and just enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
